EpsteinProject.org

Court records

2022.08.25_Motion_1

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

 IN THE SIJPERJOR CO URI
 OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS



   FILED
August 25, 2 022 01:16 ~M
 ST-20 2 0-CV-00155
 TAMARA CHARLES                      IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
CLERK OF THE COURT                        DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

                                                                         CIVIL CASE NO.: ST-2020-CV-00155

               GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

                                 Plaintiff,

               vs.

               ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
               DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as
               EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY
               E. EPSTEIN, RICHARD D. KAHN, in his
               capacity as EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE
               OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and NES, LLC, a
               New York Limited Liability Company,

                           Defendants.
               ________________________________________

                                 MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

                           Pursuant to V.I. Supreme Court Rule 211.1.16(b) and V.I.R.Civ.P. 6-5, Quintairos,

               Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A. and Kyle R. Waldner, Esq. (collectively, the “Firm”), hereby move

               to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff GHISLAINE MAXWELL. In support hereof, the

               Firm states:

                           1.    The Firm was retained as counsel for Plaintiff pursuant to a certain engagement

               agreement, which required Plaintiff to timely pay the Firm’s invoices for services rendered in

               this matter. The agreement also gave the Firm the right to terminate the engagement and

               withdraw from this representation for non-payment of any invoice.

                           2.    The Firm provided legal services to Plaintiff in connection with this matter and

               invoiced Plaintiff for legal fees and expenses incurred. Thereafter, despite repeated requests,

         

[…]

Open in the archive