EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033362

Pages
3
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

From: Richard Kahn 
Sent: 5/30/2019 3:19:40 PM 
To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeevacation@gmail.com] 
Subject: Fwd: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions 
Importance: High 
Richard Kahn 
HBRK Associates Inc. 
575 Lexington Avenue 4th Floor 
New York, NY 10022 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: "Morgan Stanley" <ms-wmir@morganstanley.com> 
Subject: Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions 
Date:  May 29, 2019 at 6:35:01 PM EDT 
To: <_________________________ 
Reply-To: <mswmir-cie-feedback@morganstanley.com> 
FF. 
Wealth Management 
Apple, Inc.: Addressing The Top 5 Investor Questions 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 033362 
'1".• 
Katy L. Huberty, CFA — Morgan Stanley 
May 29, 2019 10:28 PM GMT 
Given the risk of further restrictive trade measures, we answer investors' top questions. We expect 
shares to remain choppy, with a near-term floor around $160. Our estimates are unchanged but 
peer multiple contraction drives our SoTP-driven PT to $231 (from $240). 
What is the latest view on iPhone demand in China? On Apple's April 30th earnings call, CEO Tim 
Cook noted that the November-December period was likely to be the trough in iPhone demand in 
China, following an improvement in performance during the March quarter helped by iPhone price 
cuts, VAT tax rollbacks, increased financing options and better consumer confidence. Data from 
push-messaging service provider Jigaung shows that the improvement in iPhone demand likely 
persisted through April, where Apple gained over 175bps of Chinese smartphone installed base 
share Y/Y (1). However, the increasingly tough trade rhetoric and actions recently taken by US and 
Chinese authorities make it less likely this trend will continue into May/June. Late last week, 
following the Huawei blacklist, President Trump commented that "it's possible that Huawei would be 
________included in a trade deal", suggesting recent actions could be bargaining chips to use in trade 
negotiations that can be worked out by/around the G20 Su

[…]

Open in the archive