EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031560

Pages
3
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

From: 
Sent: 7/4/2018 1:02:08 PM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Re: Hello 
Importance: High 
Personal/Political bias is one thing (I still would exploit it any and every time on cross); this was an obsession and directly 
relevant "Stop Trump." Also, the IG made clear in his testimony Strzok told him McCabe was there. McCabe is another 
real character. He denies this; but he also is irreconcilably at odds with Comey on WSJ leak. Absolutely right that taking 
emails alone is not fair; but I would point out that it is folks like Strzok and company who have ruined many a 
businesman's life based exclusively on a twisted reading of emails sold to a jury. Flynn is an interesting case. I believe I 
could have gotten his plea back for him in a second based on what has surfaced; but he decided to go a different 
way. But as to your underlying point that there might well be something to go after with these guys, I hear you; but I have 
spent my whole career fighting bullies and crooked, unethical prosecutors. That will remain a guiding principle for me, 
whether the target is popular, hated, a complete jerk, guilty, etc. I am doing ok, thanks. I see you really follow this stuff. 
-----Original Message----- 
From: jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> 
To: David Schoen_________________________ 
Sent: Wed, Jul 4, 2018 8:51 am 
Subject: Re: Hello 
we're on the same team. strzok. testimony was that discussions with lovers , often include embellishments, and not 
indicative of non professionalism. I believe he said nothing more than it referenced " andys office". . says andy 
was there. how many other people were there ? were strzok and . off in the corner talking to each other. was 
mccabe on the phone? you know that taking emails alone is not meaningful. . isnt it a but much to say that 
prosecutors that have strong opinions . should be looked out with skepticism? who doesnt have bias. . strzok had 
many neg hillary opinions .. - michael cohen. michael flynn.. are not fictio

[…]

Open in the archive