EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030105

Pages
4
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Sent: 8/12/2016 4:15:15 AM 
To: Kathy Ruemmler 
Subject: Re: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur 
Importance: High 
Flag: Follow up 
Cool 
On Thursday, 11 August 2016, Kathy Ruemmler wrote: 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: - 
Date: August 11, 2016 at 7:52:12 PM PDT 
To:_____________________________ 
Subject: FW: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County 
entrepreneur 
From: Pizzurro, Frank (LA) < 
Date: Thursday, Aug 11, 2016, 7:41 PM 
To: Dunlavey, Dean (OC) <____________ 
Schecter, Daniel (CC) < 
Nima (LA) < 
.>> 
_____ >, 
>>, Mohebbi, 
>, Ruemmler, Kathy (DC) 
,iiruno, iicoie 
>, Harris, Nicole (CH) 
>, Greenberg, Jeffrey (LA-NY) 
>>, Bauer, Steve (SF-BR) 
>>, Moore, Wendy (OC) 
>>, Jennings, Alex (LA) Robins, Greg (LA) 
Wine, Jamie 
Subject: Press: LA Times - Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur 
The LA Times appears to be the first media to report on the verdict. Latham references are highlighted: 
BUSINESS 
Federal jury decides Middle East bank did not defraud Orange County entrepreneur<http://fw.to/aXv1QHI> 
[Farooq Bajwa] 
Farooq Bajwa 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 030105 
By Andrew Khouri 
August 11, 2016 
A federal jury decided Thursday that one of the Middle East's most prominent banks did not commit fraud and 
steal technology from an Irvine firm that sued it for half a billion dollars in damages after their partnership 
collapsed. 
Orange County company InfoSpan had alleged that Emirates NBD ended a partnership for a mobile payment 
system because it didn't want to share revenue and stole InfoSpan's technology to launch its own service. 
The Dubai-based bank, in turn, denied it stole or ever used InfoSpan's technology. It argued that it cancelled 
the partnership because InfoSpan couldn't produce a working product and misled it into thinking it was an 
established company, no

[…]

Open in the archive