EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028965

Pages
3
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

MARTIN G. WEINBERG, P. C. 
ATTORNEY AT LAW 
20 PARK PLAZA, SUITE 1000 EMAIL ADDRESSES: 
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02116 
FAX 
NIiiiiiiiiiiiCY: 
April 24, 2015 
Via Email and U.S. Mail  
John Zucker 
Assistant Legal Counsel 
Office of Legal Counsel 
77 W 66TH St, Room 1628 
New York, NY 10023 
Re: Good Morning America and Night Line interview with Jane Doe 3 
Dear Mr. Zucker: 
I represent Jeffrey Epstein. I have been informed by Producer James Hill that ABC 
intends to air an interview, conducted by a Good Morning America co-host, of a woman known 
in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 I write to put you on notice that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 
3's accusations is grossly negligent or worse. The accusations, many of which relate to my 
client, relate to alleged conduct that occurred approximately 15 years ago. The current 
accusations are simply reformatted and embellished echoes of previous allegations, which were 
first made by Jane Doe 3 to tabloid publications in the United Kingdom in 2011 and which have 
no independent news value. These allegations were then and remain now uncorroborated and 
have been refuted or undermined by other, credible evidence. Indeed, a federal judge recently 
refused to consider these allegations in pending litigation, finding them "immaterial and 
impertinent", while striking the allegations and denying Jane Doe 3s Motion to Join, See Jane 
Doe 1 and 2 v. United States, 08-CV-80736-KAM (S.D. Fla.), Dkt 324 at 5. In addition, in that 
very same litigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Timothy R. Slater filed a 
declaration stating that when Jane Doe 3 was interviewed by the FBI in 2007 she refused to 
cooperate with the investigation of Mr. Epstein declaring she wanted nothing to do with the 
matter. For ABC to air these untested allegations on national television as "news" when Jane 
Doe 3 intentionally declined eight years ago to subject these same allegations to verification by 
the FBI would be grossly irresponsible and 

[…]

Open in the archive