House Oversight — Estate records
- Pages
- 3
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
From: Lawrence Krauss Sent: 9/10/2015 8:09:42 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Fwd: an article you may both hate. or like. Attachments: DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A5OEC.png; DA866543-7401-4A5A-8E50-FD32E33A5OEC.png Importance: High Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant Origins Office origins.asu.edu I twitter.comilkraussl I krauss.faculty.asu.edu Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Noam Chomsky" Date: September 10, 2015 at 12:01:39 PM MST To: Lawrence Krauss < Subject: RE: an article you may both hate. or like. Then we're in complete agreement. Noam From: Lawrence Krauss [mailto: Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:46 PM To: Noam Chomsky ____________________ Subject: Re: an article you may both hate. or like. I couldn't agree more. Re ridicule. I never suggest ridiculing people. However by pointing out the inconsistency, or contravening evidence associated with various ideas, including for example American exceptionalism, then we are essentially subjecting ideas to ridicule. That is what I meant. Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State Universit, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404 Research Office: Assistant HOUSE OVERSIGHT 028936 Origins Office origins.asu.edu I twitter.comilkrausst I krauss.faculty.asu.edu Sent from my iPhone On Sep 10, 2015, at 10:52 AM, Noam Chomsky < > wrote: Thanks for sending. A wide area of agreement, but not total. On confronting dogma, I of course agree — though in my opinion the secular religions — nationalist fanaticism, etc. — are much more dangerous. And if some find rational discussion offensive — as, for example, mainstream academics find dismantling myths […]