House Oversight — Estate records
- Pages
- 3
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
From: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Sent: 8/22/2018 7:23:38 PM To: Starr, Ken Subject: Re: Jed Rubenfeld i read turley,s piece on same subject / federalist papers etc. too much in the weeds. average joe. not sure what he concluded On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 3:17 PM, Starr, Ken _______________________ wrote: Wise counsel. Thx! Sent from my iPhone On Aug 22, 2018, at 1:49 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: I think scholarly but not too much so. no one above the law.. we began leaving a kingdom. . unlikely to give king like powers to a president. on one above the law. I would like lunch pail joe to come away and think, this guy is smart . I understood. lets see what he writes about the clintons. someone suggested that trump could shoot someone on fifth avenue and not lose a vote, that is true , but would make little sense for him not to suffer an immediate consequence. the allowed civil depo setting precedent for criminal process , is a lawyers outline I might think of dumbing it down, again, and suggesting that you can sue your neighbor, even if you neighbor is the president. makes little sense that the you can be indicted for assaulting him but he cannot if he assaults you. low bar for civil higher bar for criminal. . at some point on your book tour I might point out how disappointed you were that the clinton and betty curries' trashcan story, was reopened. . On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:08 PM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: i vote yes as it makes you relevant to today rather than merely re- reciting an old tale. :) or tail? On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:07 PM, Starr, Ken wrote: Can you talk? Impt. Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2018, at 9:18 AM, jeffrey E. <jeevacation@gmail.com> wrote: thx On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:14 AM, Starr, Ken wrote: Good morning! Jed teaches crim law at Yale. Outspokenly strong on the need for procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Relevant to your friend's unhappy situation? […]