EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321

Pages
3
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

From: Larry Summers 
Sent: 9/12/2018 3:01:20 AM 
To: jeeyacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Fwd: This morning 
Importance: High 
More than u may want to know 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter @lhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: "Maskin, Eric" 
Date: September 11, 2018 at 10:24:21 PM EDT 
To: LHS 
Subject: RE: This morning 
I believe there are, but don't know how careful they are. I will try to get you references. 
From: LHS < 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:23 PM 
To: Maskin, Eric <11 
Cc: lhsoffice 
Subject: Re: This morning 
Are there empirical studies on turnout. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Please direct all scheduling inquiries to my office at: 
Follow me on twitter @lhsummers 
www.larrysummers.com  
On Sep 11, 2018, at 10:20 PM, Maskin, Eric < > wrote: 
Yes, we can expect more extremists to run under RCV. But also more centrists (e.g., Bloomberg). Since the centrists are 
closer to the median voter, they will defeat the extremists. 
The evidence I have seen suggests that RCV increases turn-out. [But it's important that voters be given the choice to 
rank as many or few candidates as they like, so that a voter always has the option of voting for a single candidate (in 
effect, he would be ranking all other candidates as tied for second). In practice, most voters choose to rank two or three 
candidates, but a significant fraction just rank one] 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026321 
In fact the increase in the diversity of candidates under RCV is related to turn-out. If RCV had been used in 2016, Bernie 
Sanders could have run as an independent in the general election without fear of guaranteeing a Trump victory. Many 
of the Bernie supporters who stayed home on election day might then have voted---and presumably would have ranked 
Clinton second. This would have given her a victory over Trump in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania (and possibly 
elsewhere). 
Eric 
From: LHS ____________

[…]

Open in the archive