EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026273

Pages
7
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

From: Steve Bannon 
Sent: 6/23/2018 12:44:08 PM 
To: jeevacation@gmail.com 
Subject: Fwd: Re: 
Attachments: image001.png; image002.png; image003.png; image004.png 
Importance: High 
Big deal 
Begin forwarded message: 
Resent-From: 
From: "Rivkin, David" 
Date: June 23, 2018 at 8:14:49 AM EDT 
To: Steve Bannon 
Subject: Fwd: Re: 
Here it is. 
Sent from my iPhone 
Begin forwarded message: 
From: "Grossman, Andrew M" _________ 
Date: June 23, 2018 at 12:56:55 AM EDT 
To: "Rivkin, David" 
Subject: Re: 
Mueller's Fruit of the Poisonous Tree 
It makes no difference how honorable he is. His investigation is tainted by the bias that 
attended its origin in 2016. 
By 
David B. Rivkin Jr. and 
Elizabeth Price Foley 
June 22, 2018 6:38 p.m. ET 
414  COMMENTS 
Special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation may face a serious legal obstacle: It is tainted by 
antecedent political bias. The June 14 report from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department's 
inspector general, unearthed a pattern of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking officials at the Federal 
Bureau of Investigation. Some of their communications, the report says, were "not only indicative of a 
biased state of mind but imply a willingness to take action to impact a presidential candidate's electoral 
prospects." Although Mr. Horowitz could not definitively ascertain whether this bias "directly 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026273 
affected" specific FBI actions in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, it nonetheless affects the 
legality of the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, code-named Crossfire Hurricane. 
Crossfire was launched only months before the 2016 election. Its FBI progenitors—the same ones who 
had investigated Mrs. Clinton—deployed at least one informant to probe Trump campaign advisers, 
obtained Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court wiretap warrants, issued national security letters to 
gather records, and unmasked the identities of campaign officials who were surveilled. They also 
repeatedly leaked investigative

[…]

Open in the archive