HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022673

Pages

11

Text

Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

From: 
Sent: 
To: 
Subject: 
Attachments: 
Kathy Ruemmler 
1/30/2015 5:26:02 PM 
jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] 
Fwd: 
image006.png; image007.png; image005.jpg; image010.jpg; image001.jpg; image003.jpg; image008.png; 
image004.jpg; image002.jpg; image009.png 
Importance: High 
Did you see this?! Privileged -Redacted 
L. 
Forwarded message---------- 
From: <1_ 
Date: Jan 30, 2015 12:25 PM 
Subject: 
To: < 
Cc: 
Plenty Of Innuendo, But No Hard Evidence Of New Clinton 
Sex Scandal 
Much-discussed documents in Jeffrey Epstein affair don't live up to the hype. 
posted on Jan. 28, 2015, at 10:53 p.m. 
-1-
ka.a3J 
Ken Bensinger 
BuzzFeed News Reporter 
Share 
Tweet 
Share 
Share 
Share 
Share 
Tweet 
Share 
Share 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022673 
Tweet 
Share 
Share 
Share 
Share 
Bookmark it 
View this image 
Carlo Allegri / Reuters 
Over roughly the past month, coverage of Bill Clinton's travels with financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein have made 
their way from a thick stack of court documents into something approaching political mythology, propelled by a string of innuendo-
laced reports hinting that the former president must have been in some way complicit when he voyaged with a billionaire known for 
preying on underage girls. 
It's a story with plenty to gape at, from horrific and excruciatingly detailed allegations against Epstein to the frequent presence of a 
former president who was, after all, nearly chased from office for a (consensual) affair with an intern. 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022674 
National Enquirer 
But sometimes stories that seem too good to be true —just might be. A detailed review by a team of BuzzFeed News reporters of 
more than 2,000 pages of pleadings, depositions, affidavits, police reports, flight logs, and other documents filed in state and federal 
court found that many of the most provocative allegations about Clinton have little to no factual foundation and are exaggerated at 
best; that the documents — which appear to be the source 

[…]

Open in the archive