EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — Estate records

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013489

Pages
12
Text
Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY JAMES EDWARDS 
1. I am an attorney in good standing with the Florida Bar and admitted to practice in the 
Southern District of Florida. I am a partner in the law firm of Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos and 
Lehrman. 
2. I am the lead attorney currently representing "Jane Doe" in the case of Jane Doe v. 
Jeffrey Epstein, case number 08-80893 in federal Court in the Southern District of Florida. I am the lead 
attorney representing Jane Doe, whose civil complaint alleges that Epstein sexually molested her 
numerous occasions when she was a minor. 
3. Defendant Epstein has entered into a "non-prosecution agreement" (NPA) with the 
federal government for sex crimes against minors. Under that agreement, the federal government has 
agreed not to file criminal charges against Epstein for sex crimes committed against approximately thirty 
girls, including Jane Doe. In exchange, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to state law criminal charges 
involving solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. The victim of the criminal 
charges to which he has pled was not Jane Doe. • 
4. Under the NPA, Epstein has agreed not to contest civil liability of any of his 
approximately thirty victims - provided that the victim agrees to limit themselves to the damages 
provided by 18 U.S.C. § 2255 (currently set at $150,000).. Jane Doe has not agreed to limit herself. to 
pursuing only $150,000- in damages. Therefore, the terms of the NPA purport to prevent Jane Doe from 
using the NPAto prove liability. 
• • 
. . 
5. Epstein has filed an answer to Jane Doe's complaint, in which he has invoked his Fifth 
Amendment right to silence with respect to the allegations that he molested her as a child. Epstein has 
further argued that this Fifth Amendment invocation is the functional equivalent of, and must be 
treated as, a specific denial of the allegations. 
6. Defendant•Epstein's deposition has been taken on several occasions,.in this and other 
rela

[…]

Open in the archive