HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011463

Pages

9

Text

Searchable

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 
X 
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, 
Plaintiff, 
V. 
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, 
Defendant. 
X 
15-cv-07433-RWS 
Defendant's Response in Opposition to 
Plaintiffs Omnibus Motion in Limine 
Laura A. Menninger 
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca 
Ty Gee 
HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C. 
150 East 10th Avenue 
Denver, CO 80203 
303.831.7364 
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 011463 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 
I. FED. R. EVID. 405(B) REQUIRES ADMISSION OF ALL SPECIFIC INCIDENTS OF 
PLAINTIFF LYING OR ENGAGING IN DECEITFUL OR FRAUDULENT CONDUCT 1 
A. All allegations or comments made by Plaintiff are "connected to" the alleged defamatory 
statement..............................................................................................................................4 
B. Responses to Enumerated Motions In Limine.....................................................................6 
1. Stories and allegations concerning Dershowitz, foreign presidents, and world leaders 
are highly relevant and admissible (Motion in Limine 1)...............................................6 
2. Meeting Bill Clinton at Jeffrey Epstein's private island twice (Motion in Limine 2)..... 8 
3. FOIA responses and related materials are admissible (Motion in Limine 3)................... 8 
4. Louis Freeh's testimony and report are admissible evidence (Motion in Limine 4).......9 
5. Prince Andrew and Buckingham Palace's denials of Plaintiff's claims are not offered 
for the truth of the matter asserted (Motion in Limine 5).............................................. 11 
6. Evidence Regarding Plaintiff's Sexual History and Reputation is Admissible (Motion in 
Limine 6)....................................................................................................................... 14 
7. Plaintiff cannot prohibit use of words such as "prostitute," which 

[…]

Open in the archive