DOJ evidence release
- Format
- Set
- DOJ Data Set 8
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 100%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. : 20 Cr. 330 (MN) x MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT'S SUBPOENA TO BOIES SCHILLER AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Bobbi C. Stemheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Stemheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Chislaine Maxwell EFTA00011452 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ii TABLE OF EXHIBITS iv INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT 1 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2 A. The Protective Order in v. Maxwell 2 B. Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions 4 C. The Settlement And Boies Schiller's Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order 6 D. The Government's False Statements To Judge McMahon 6 E. Judge Netburn Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government 10 ARGUMENT 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Power, This Court Should Suppress The Evidence Obtained From Boies Schiller, And Dismiss Counts Five And Six, Which Are The Fruits Of That Evidence 11 I. The role of protective orders in civil litigation 11 2. The government circumvented the protective order 12 3. The government violated due proces • 14 4. This court possesses the inherent authority to order suppression 15 B. At A Minimum, This Court Should Order A Hearing At Which Maxwell May Inquire Into The Circumstances Surrounding The Government's Misrepresentations To Judge McMahon 16 CONCLUSION 16 Certificate of Service 18 EFTA00011453 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Benkovitch v. Gorilla, Inc., No. […]