EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00017610

Trial Day 3 - 745

Format
pdf
File
Trial Day 3 - 745.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
264
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
91%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

= No Ww ws Ol OY ~] oe) WO   a ie) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 _ Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 264 407 LC1VMAX1   iD STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK a Z =                           G Z =   ‘iD STATES OF AMERICA, Vv. 20 CR 330 (AJN)   GHISLAINE MAXWELL,         Defendant. Jury Trial   New York, N.Y. December 1, 2021 8:55 a.m.   Before: HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge APPEARANCES DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: MAURENE COMEY ALISON MOE LARA POMERANTZ ANDREW ROHRBACH Assistant United States Attorneys HADDON MORGAN AND FOREMAN Attorneys for Defendant BY: JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL LAURA A. MENNINGER       -—and- BOBBI C. STERNHEIM -and- RENATO STABILE     Also Present: Amanda Young, FBI Paul Byrne, NYPD Sunny Drescher, Paralegal, U.S. Attorney's Office Ann Lundberg, Paralegal, Haddon Morgan and Foreman SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300   DOJ-OGR-00017610 

  Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 _ Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 264 408 LC1VMAX1               1 (Trial resumed; jury not present) 2 THE COURT: All right. Matters to take up, counsel, 5 includes the Rule 16/608, as I see it, issue. And then I want 4 to see where you are in terms of working out anticipated > personal identifying information of witnesses who I've given 6 permission to testify under pseudonyms to protect their 7 privacy. 8 So let's begin. 9 Ms. Menninger, did you want to begin with the Rule 16 10 issue? 11 MS. MENNINGER: I think Mr. Everdell was going to 12 handle that piece. 13 THE COURT: Okay. 14 Ms. Comey, are you taking this? 15 MR. ROHRBACH: I'm taking this one, your Honor. 16 THE COURT: You all swapped off. 17 So I think the defense is clearly right that if we are 18 talking by impeachment by contradiction, that is to say, 19 impeachment, direct contradiction of something testified to on 20 the stand, it's not required to be disclosed as case-in-chief 21 material under Rule

[…]

Open in the archive