House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 640.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 1
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 92%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 640 _ Filed 03/10/22 Pagelof1 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK poc# DATE FILED: 3/10/22 United States of America, —V— 20-CR-330 (AJN) Ghislaine Maxwell, ORDER Defendant. ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Per the Court’s instruction at the March 8 hearing, the parties submitted revised redactions to their briefing on the Defendant’s motion for a new trial. The Court rejects the Defendant’s proposed redaction to page 8, lines 6-7 of her reply because it is not necessary to protect any continuing interest in juror anonymity and privacy. See Dkt. No. 607. The Court concludes that the remaining proposed redactions are narrowly tailored to further the important interest of protecting juror anonymity and privacy. Press-Enter. Co. v. Superior Ct. of Cal., Riverside Cnty., 464 U.S. 501, 511-12 (1984). The parties are ORDERED to file the redacted briefs (with the above noted line unredacted) on the docket on or before March 11, 2022. The Court will file the unredacted briefs under seal. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 10, 2022 AM \) Ik New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge DOJ-OGR- 00009692