House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 629.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 1
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 90%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Casas: 2@20rOCkReP AGN DumunrentG25 AréelORs0Rs222 Paétege ofdf 1 LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA 212-243-1100 * Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715 917-912-9698 °* Cell USDC SDNY New York, NY 10007 888-587-4737 * Fax DOCUMENT besternheim@mac.com ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 3/3/22 No grounds are offered for March 2, 2022 entitlement to the requested proffer, and the Court is not aware of any Honorable Alison J. Nathan basis for granting the request. United States District Judge DENIED. United States Courthouse SO ORDERED. 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 AM igo Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell 3/3/22 S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Dear Judge Nathan: In response to a letter from Juror 50’s counsel indicating the juror’s intention to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination at the upcoming hearing (Dkt. 624), the government has informed the Court that it is in the process of making an application for a grant of immunity for the juror. (Dkt. 625). Juror 50 has publicly stated that he “answered all questions honestly.” Ms. Maxwell requests a proffer from Juror 50’s counsel explaining the basis for his client’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment and the government’s willingness to provide immunity to Juror 50. Very truly yours, BOBBI C. STERNHEIM cc: Counsel of record DOJ-OGR-00009621