House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 508.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 25
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 87%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document508- Filed 11/24/21 Page1of25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA y 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S RESPONSE TO THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO PRECLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DR. RYAN HALL, BENNETT GERSHMAN, ROBERT KELSO, JOHN LOPEZ, GERALD LAPORTE, AND JENNIFER NASO Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR- 00008086 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document508 _ Filed 11/24/21 Page2of25 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... .ccecseseecesseeeesessesseceeesecneesecneeseceaeaesaessesaecaeveeeneeseeeaeeeesaeseevareneeereneeeres i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......cccceecceceeceeseeseeseeeeeeenseseesaecsessecneesecneeseesaeseeaecaeeaeeneeseseaeeeeaeeneeatens il INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT. ........cceeceseeeeeseeeenseeeeeseteeeaeeneeatens 1 ARGUMENT .......cceceeseeseseeeseeseeeeneesesaeseeaecneesecneeseessesnesaesaesaecneesecneeseesaesaesaeeaeeaecneverenteeseaeeaeeaeenees 1 I. Dr. Hall’s Testimony Is Admissible. .............cccceecceesceeeeeceneceeeeeeneeceeecaeenneesaeecsaeenaeensneesaeeeaeens 1 A. Factual background. ............ccccccceeeseeeseceseeeseeecseeceseeeseeecaeecsaeceeeeseeecaaecaeeuseeesaeesaeeeeeseneenaees 3 B. The severnient’s mation is, net 4, Rule 702 Chalet iG cccs cnc ness mameesscnsws vasancan S C. Excluding Dr. Hall’s expert opinions would deprive Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional rights to confrontation and to present a defense. 0... eecceeceeeeeeeeceeeeeeeeeeeeesaeessaeeneenees 6 CL ...................................-- 7 I «ccc 12 3. Dr. Hall’s opinions are not unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403. 0.0... […]