EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00006973

Format
pdf
File
459.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
43
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
92%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

be NO (ee) ws Ol OY ~] co Ne}   a ie) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 LalWmaxC     a Z =   iD STATES   DISTRICT COURT         BERN D     STR   CT OF NEW YORK         Gq Z =         GHISLA       Vv. ‘D STATES OF AMERICA, NE MAXWELL, Defendant.   Before: Filed 11/15/21 20 Cr. 330 Page 1 of 43 1 (AJN) Telephone Conference New York, N.Y. October 21, 12:00 p.m. HON. ALISON J. NATHAN, APPEARANCES DAMIAN WILLIAMS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York LARA E. POMERANTZ BOBBI C. BY's       BY: Also —-and- COHEN & GRESSER LLP ALISON G. MOE ANDREW ROHRBACH MAURENE R. COMEY Assistant United States Attorneys STERNHEIM Attorney for Defendant   CHRISTIAN R. EVERDELL -and- HADDON, MORGAN and FOREMAN, P.C. LAURA A. MENNINGER JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA     Present: SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. Rigoberto Landers Susan Yee Foon Rhonda Mayers-—Best Thomas Mixon (212) 805-0300   2021 District Judge DOJ-OGR-00006973 

be NO (ee) ws Ol OY ~] co Ne}   20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 459 _ Filed 11/15/21 Page2of43 2 LalWmaxC (Case called; appearances noted) =   THE COURT: Good afternoon, everyone. This is Judge Nathan. We are here for a pretrial conference in this matter. The case is scheduled to commence the jury selection process on   November 4, trial to commence on November 29. The primary purpose of today's conference is to go over jury selection matters and logistics. I'll also address     the request to seal the proposed questionnaire and voir dire submitted by the parties, as I indicated I would in my order docketed yesterday. As a preliminary matter, let me note that we are proceeding telephonically today. Counsel, my view is that, under Rule 43, we need not be in person with Ms. Maxwell present for today's proceeding. We do have Ms. Maxwell on the phone, of course. I do want to make sure counsel agree with that view and have no objection to proceeding remotely by phone conference today. Ms. Pomerantz. MS. POMERANTZ: The gov

[…]

Open in the archive