EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00006572

Format
pdf
File
442.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
12
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
90%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 442 Filed 11/12/21 Page1of12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ANY EVIDENCE OFFERED BY THE GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 404(b) FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE RULE’S NOTICE REQUIREMENT Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR-00006572 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 442 Filed 11/12/21 Page2of12 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND 1.0... eececeecesseseesseeseeseesesecneseensesecnsenesaecsesaecaeeseenseseesaeseesaesaeaecnevaeeneeseseaeeeesaeeateatens 1 I. 2020 Amendments to Rule 404(b)..........ccccecceeeeeeeseeeceeeeeeeeeeeeenaecaeenneesaeessaeeneeeeeneenneesaeens 1 II. Rule 404(b) Notice in This Case .0.......ccceeceeccesceeeeeceeeceeeceeeeesneesnaecaeenneesaeecaeenaeeneneesaeeesaeens Zz ARGUMENT ........cecescesseeseesecseeseeneeseenseseeaecnevsecnseseessesnesaecaesecaeesecneeseenaessesaesaeeaecnaeseenseseeeaeeaeeaeentes 4 I. By Failing to Comply with the Rule 404(b) Notice Requirement, the Government Has Waived the Admission of Any Evidence Pursuant to the Rule.............ceeeeseeseeeeeeeeeeeeeeenees 4 II. Should the Government's Failure Be Excused, Ms. Maxwell Requests an Opportunity to Rebut any Proffered Non-Propensity Purpose and Basis ...........::ccscecsseseseeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeseeesneeeaees 5 Il]. Ms. Maxwell Needs Additional Time to Respond to the Scant Notice that the Materials Qualify as “Direct Evidence” in the Case 00... ccesecsseeecseeseesseseeesecaesseceeeeaeseesaesaeeaeeas 6 8.6), 8) 18) ee 7 DOJ-OGR-00006573 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 442 

[…]

Open in the archive