EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00005956

Format
pdf
File
398.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
52
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
91%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page1of52 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. GHISLAINE MAXWELL’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTIONS IN LIMINE Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 225 Broadway, Suite 715 New York, NY 10007 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR-00005956 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 398 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 52 TABLE OF CONTENTS THIS COURT SHOULD PRECLUDE INTRODUCTION OF ALLEGED CO- CONSPIRATOR STATEMENTS AS A SANCTION FOR GOVERNMENT'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT’S SEPTEMBER 3, 2021 ORDER 1 A. The Court’s Order was Neither Ambiguous Nor Misread by the Defense..................... 1 B. The Court Has the Authority to Require Disclosure ..............................0000000eeeeeeeeeeeeees 2 C3 ea ee a Sh oe rsrcrs crcmmnnnmnnunmmnacmmanans 4 D. There are Substantial Issues with the Government’s Anticipated Position.................... 5 GOVERNMENT CONCEDEDLY FAILED TO GIVE NOTICE OF THE BASIS OR REASONING TO ADMIT ANY 404(B) EVIDENCE 6 A. — The Emails Bear No Relationship to the Charged Conspiracy, Reflect Pure Propensity Evidence, and Otherwise are Unduly Prejudicial to Uninvolved Third-Party Adults . 7 rn 11 ......... 12 2. The government has apparently abandoned efforts to introduce her testimony as Rule OE) GI sc ssi scsi tindstinic de Seis ccl CNC Cais ncicatlsdies 13 3. EE ©oustitutes an impermissible constructive amendment and variance to the Indictment. .2.................ceccescesceeceeeeeeeeseeseeseeseesteeeaeeees 13 C. Ms. Maxwell reiterates her request to defer briefing and ruling on the admissibility yyy Se ee 15 THIS COURT SHOULD EXCLUDE LISA ROCCH

[…]

Open in the archive