EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00005269

Format
pdf
File
362.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
4
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
92%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

e 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 362 Filed 10/20/21 Page1of4 REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS October 20. 2021 1156 15th St. NW, Suite 1020 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 795-9300 * www.refp.org BY ECF Bruce D. Brown, Executive Director bbrown@refp.org + (202) 795-9301 . The Honorable Alison J. Nathan STEERING COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN STEPHEN I. ADLER United States District Court STEERING-COMMITTEE MEMBERS Southern District of New York WOLF BLITZER CNN United States Courthouse “indiiteacte 40 Foley Square Temple University THEODORE J, BOUTROUS TR, New York, New York 10007 MASSIMO CALABRESI cent onneta Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Austin American-Statesman San Francisco Chronicle Dear Judge Nathan, JOSH GERSTEIN POLITICO ALEX GIBNEY With the government’s consent, the defendant has requested to file the SUSAN GOLDBERG National Geographic . oe . . . oe . . awe Gantatoy parties’ joint proposed juror questionnaire and joint proposed voir dire under seal. The Wall Street Journal LAURA HANDMAN, 3 ve 5 Davis Wright Tremaine Letter of U.S. Att’y, October 12, 2021 (Dkt. No. 339) (“Letter”). The Reporters DIEGO IBARGUEN Hearst NRHN Coie Committee for Freedom of the Press and the 17 undersigned news media KAREN KAISER Associated Press . . 5 DAVID LAUTER organizations respectfully urge the Court to deny the defendant’s request. Globe e Los Angeles Times MARGARET LOW WBUR a ee Newspaper Co. v. Superior Ct. for Norfolk Cty., 457 U.S. 596, 609 n.25 (1982) The McClatchy Company MAGGIE MULVIHILL ; “ ; : ; bbosen Unnveratey (stating that “representatives of the press and general public must be given an JAMES NEFF The Philadelphia Inquirer NOR As BEART OTR opportunity to be heard on the question of their exclusion” (cleaned up)).! THOMAS C. RUBIN Stanford Law School A F pn GG SAR Both the common law and the First Amendment afford the public a qualified BakerHostetler, ret. CHARLIE SAVAGE . . . . Te New York Times right of access to criminal proceedings. Inde

[…]

Open in the archive