House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 322.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 4
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 93%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Césash: 2@20roCkRePAGN DuamunresnttB2D Aiée0esi6j201 Patage afef 4 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED U.S. Department of Justice DOC #: ; DATE FILED: 8/19/21 United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew’s Plaza New York, New York 10007 The parties are hereby ORDERED to meet and confer in an effort to reach an agreement on the VIA ECF The Honorable Alison J. Nathan August 18, 2021 disclosure issues raised in this United States District Court Southern District of New York letter. If the parties reach an United States Courthouse AM \) iff agreement, they shall inform the 40 Foley Square 56 GRURERD: 8/19/21 Court by August 26, 2021. If the New York, New York 10007 cic cia i parties do not reach agreement, the Defendant may file a response to the arguments made here by the Government on or before August Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) |39- 2021. Any response letter shall confirm that the meet and confer Dear Judge Nathan: occurred. SO ORDERED. The Government respectfully submits this letter in response to footnote 1 of the Court’s Opinion and Order denying the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell’s supplemental pretrial motions. (Dkt. No. 317). In that footnote, the Court noted that the defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars included a request that the Government identify her unnamed co-conspirators, as did her position in the parties’ joint letter regarding the disclosure schedule. The Court wrote that, because the Government had not objected, it “presumes the Government intends to disclose this information to Maxwell at the same time that . . . it discloses Jencks Act material.” (/d. at 12 n.1). To be clear, the Government objects to any requirement that it provide an exhaustive list of co-conspirators, whether in a bill of particulars or otherwise, and does not intend to do so absent further order of the Court. ! ' The Government has opposed the defendant’s requests for such a li […]