House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 286.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 14
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 90%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ween ee ee = = = - x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) V. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. REPLY MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE SURPLUSAGE FROM SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR-00004214 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page2of14 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Irrelevant to the Alleged Conspiracies. .......... 2 Il. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Unduly Prejudicial to Ms. Maxwell. .............. 6 Il. At Minimum, the Government Must Demonstrate the Admissibility of Evidence Regarding Accuser-3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b). oo... occ ceccc ccc cece ceseceeeteseeesseenseeeees 9 CONCLUSION ....00...ceceecceceescesceseeseeseeseesseesersecaeesecseesecnsescesaeeseaecaesecsseseesaeeseaeeaeesecsevsessaeeneeaseneeaes 10 i DOJ-OGR-00004215 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page3of14 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions, 137 S.Ct. 1562 (2017) ooo cccceccccc cece cecceceecesecesececseecssecesecsseesseecsseesesesseecseeesseeeseeesseesteeesseenseeeses 6 United States v. DeFabritus, 605 F. Supp. 1538 (S.D.N-Y. 1985)... ccc cccccccccecececceceseceseeeseecssecssecesecesseecsseesseeesseesseeesseenseeeses 8 United States v. Greebel, No. 15-cr-637 (KAM), 2017 WL 3610570 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 4, 2017) ..cccccccssscsssecsssecessessseessseeen 8 United States v. Hitt, 249 F.3d 1010 (D.C. Cir. 2001) ooo. ccccccccesecesseecseeeseceseeesseeessecseseeeessaecnsee […]