House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 285-03.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 3
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 89%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-3 Filed 05/20/21 Pagelof3 EXHIBIT L DOJ-OGR-00004187 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-3 Filed 05/20/21 Page2of3 From: Kramer, Amanda (USANYS) To: Diskant, Edward (USANYS); Capone, Russell (USANYS); Kurland, Abigail (USANYS) Subject: FW: Virginia Guiffre Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 4:01:53 PM From: Peter Skinner <PSkinner@BSFLLP.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:28 PM To: Kramer, Amanda (USANYS) <AKramer@usa.doj.gov> Cc: StanPottinger@aol.com; brad@pathtojustice.com; Sigrid McCawley <Smccawley@BSFLLP.com> Subject: RE: Virginia Guiffre Amanda, If you haven’t already seen it, the Post reported today on Jeffrey Epstein’s continued relationships with young women. playmates/ Best, Pete From: Peter Skinner Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:13 PM To: Amanda Kramer Ce: StanPottinger@aol.com; brad@pathtojustice.com; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Virginia Guiffre Amanda, | am adding Sigrid McCawley to this email chain as well. As we mentioned earlier today, Sigrid is one of the lead attorneys on the case and knows both Virginia and the facts very well. Please include Sigrid in any follow-up that you may. Best, Pete From: Peter Skinner <pskinner@bsfllp.com> Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM To: Amanda Kramer <amanda.kramer@usdoj.gov> SDNY_GM_02742756 DOJ-OGR-00004188 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-3 Filed 05/20/21 Page3of3 Ce: "StanPottinger@aol.com" <StanPottinger@aol.com>, "brad@pathtojustice.com" <brad@pathtojustice.com> Subject: Virginia Guiffre Amanda, Thank you again for meeting with us today. We very much appreciate your time. | am attaching the following documents for your review: 1. Complaint in the defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell (just today, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell’s motion to dismiss today); 2. Declarations that Virginia filed in the CVRA case; 3. The Rule 56.1 statement recently filed in the CVRA case; 4. The redacted 302 Please let us know what other information we can provide or if yo […]