House Oversight — DOJ production
- Format
- File
- 217.pdf
- Set
- House Oversight (DOJ)
- Pages
- 6
- Text
- Searchable
- Text confidence
- 85%
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document217 Filed 04/19/21 Page1of6 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.c Laura A. Menninger HAD DION 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628 www.hmilaw.com LMenninger@hmflaw.com MORGAN FOREMAN April 1, 2021 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Joint Letter Concerning Redactions to Omnibus Response & Exhibit 11 Dear Judge Nathan: Pursuant to this Court’s Order of March 29, 2021 (Dkt. No. 189), the parties respectfully submit this joint letter concerning redactions to the Omnibus Memorandum in Opposition to the Defendant’s Pre-Trial Motions (“Response”). Joint Position The parties no longer seek the proposed redactions to pages 118 and 119 of the government’s Response. Ms. Maxwell’s Position Ms. Maxwell seeks to redact from pages 129-134 of the Response and from Exhibit 11 only those portions of her July 22, 2016 deposition as to which Judge Preska ruled: public access to [these] parts of the transcript is outweighed by Ms. Maxwell's countervailing interests in resisting disclosure of the details of her private, intimate relationships with consenting adults. This testimony is, in any case, far afield from the sex trafficking and sexual abuse allegations that were central to the dispute in Giuffre v. Maxwell. Although the prurient interest of some may be left unsatiated as a result, Ms. Maxwell's interest in keeping private the details of her sexual relationships with consenting adults warrants the sealing of those portions of her testimony (and any materials that reference them). DOJ-OGR-00003847 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 217 Filed 04/19/21 Page2of6 The Hon. Alison J. Nathan April 1, 2021 Page 2 Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7466-LAP, Tr. of Jan. 19, 2021 at 6-7. Ms. Maxwell moved to suppress use of her deposition testimony, including these quotes, based on the g […]