EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00003540

Format
pdf
File
204-06.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
2
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
94%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-6 Filed 04/16/21 Page1of2 From: Kramer, Amanda (USANYS) To: Diskant, Edward (USANYS); Capone, Russell (USANYS); Kurland, Abigail (USANYS) Subject: FW: Virginia Guiffre Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 4:01:53 PM From: Peter Skinner <PSkinner@BSFLLP.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:28 PM To: Kramer, Amanda (USANYS) <AKramer@usa.doj.gov> Cc: StanPottinger@aol.com; brad@pathtojustice.com; Sigrid McCawley <Smccawley@BSFLLP.com> Subject: RE: Virginia Guiffre Amanda, If you haven’t already seen it, the Post reported today on Jeffrey Epstein’s continued relationships with young women.   playmates/ Best, Pete From: Peter Skinner Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:13 PM To: Amanda Kramer Cc: StanPottinger@aol.com; brad@pathtojustice.com; Sigrid McCawley Subject: Re: Virginia Guiffre Amanda, lam adding Sigrid McCawley to this email chain as well. As we mentioned earlier today, Sigrid is one of the lead attorneys on the case and knows both Virginia and the facts very well. Please include Sigrid in any follow-up that you may. Best, Pete From: Peter Skinner <pskinner@bsfllp.com> Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM To: Amanda Kramer <amanda.kramer@usdoj.gov> DOJ-OGR-00003540 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204-6 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2of2 Ce: "StanPottinger@aol.com" <StanPottinger@aol.com>, "brad@pathtojustice.com" <brad@pathtojustice.com> Subject: Virginia Guiffre Amanda, Thank you again for meeting with us today. We very much appreciate your time. | am attaching the following documents for your review: 1. Complaint in the defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell (just today, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell’s motion to dismiss today); 2. Declarations that Virginia filed in the CVRA case; 3. The Rule 56.1 statement recently filed in the CVRA case; 4. The redacted 302 Please let us know what other information we can provide or if you have any further questions. Best, Pete   The information contained in this electronic message is confident

[…]

Open in the archive