EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00002935

Format
pdf
File
204.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
239
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
91%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 239 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee, x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -V.- i S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. SpaeR EEE EERE EEE x THE GOVERNMENT’S OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney Southern District of New York Attorney for the United States of America Alison Moe Maurene Comey Lara Pomerantz Andrew Rohrbach Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - DOJ-OGR-00002935 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 239 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT. uuu... ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccsccscccssccccscscscssscsssssssssssssssssssssssssssscees 1 BACKGROUND .iiii....cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccscccccscccsccccccssccsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssscees 2 ARGUMENT .22.............cccccccccccccscccrcccccccccscccscscscscscscccscscscssscscscscssssscscsesssesesecscssesesssscssesscssscscscscscecs 3 I. Jeffrey Epstein’s Non-Prosecution Agreement Is Irrelevant to This Case...............sseee 3 A. The NPA Does Not Bind the Southern District of New York...........cc.cccccecceseeeeeececececeeneneees 4 1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other Districts ........... 5 2. The Defendant Has Offered No Evidence That the NPA Binds Other Districts............... 9 B. The NPA Does Not Immunize Maxwell from Prosecution ............ccceeeeeeececececceeeeeeeeeceeceeees 15 1. The NPA Is Limited to Particular Crimes Between 2001 and 2007 0.00... eeeeeeeeeeeee 15 2. The NPA Does Not Confer Enforceable Rights on Maxwell............ccccsscesssesereeeseeseeeees 17 C. The Defendant Has Offered No Basis for Additional Discovery or a Hearing .................. 21 II. The Indictment Is Timely .................ccsccssscesscssscsssccssscssscsssscsscssssssssssscssssesssesssssssscssssessneees 23 Cg Bec 24 B. The 2003 Amendment to Section 3283 Appli

[…]

Open in the archive