EpsteinProject.org

House Oversight — DOJ production

DOJ-OGR-00002348

Format
pdf
File
134.pdf
Set
House Oversight (DOJ)
Pages
23
Text
Searchable
Text confidence
88%

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT’S SUBPOENA TO AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX Jeffrey S. Pagliuca Laura A. Menninger HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C. 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 Phone: 303-831-7364 Mark S. Cohen Christian R. Everdell COHEN & GRESSER LLP 800 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 Phone: 212-957-7600 Bobbi C. Sternheim Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor New York, NY 10011 Phone: 212-243-1100 Attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell DOJ-OGR- 00002348 

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS. ucncssssssssssssssssssssssssessssssscesesesesssssssstsssssssuvsssessssesesssesasersssasnsssasesesesessesesees i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........ cece ecceceeceeseeseeseeseesecssessesseceeesecnevsecneeseceaeseeaesnevaeeneeseeeaeseeaeeaeeatens ii LABILE: OF FEXTIBIT SS sescusss ssstcessws assess canis nce tx aitesven Ss thE SGIS Sha GS SONSTIGES iv INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT. .........cceececseceneeeeceseeeeeseeeeeaeeaeeatens 1 OR, TR LE ices ec RR RNR A RANE z A. The Protective Order in Giuffre v. Maxwell ....cccsccscesessesneeseeeseeneeensecnsesaeeseeseeenaeenaeenneeas 2 B. Maxwell’s April and July 2016 depositions 0.0... eeceeeeseesseeneeseeeeeeeseesecnaeeaeesneeenenatenaes 4 C. The Settlement And J Refusal To Comply With The Protective Order..... 6 D. The Government’s False Statements To MM ..............0..00.0000000...2 6 E. [ERG Separately Rejects An Identical Gambit By The Government................ 10 ARGUMENT 0... eccceeccseesecseeeecsesecsaecaesaecaeesecseesecsaesaeaesaeesecsesseesaesessaesaesaecaeeaesseeseesaesessaesaeeatens 11 A. Pursuant To Its Inherent Po

[…]

Open in the archive