EpsteinProject.org

Court records

20250509132003864_24-1073_Amicus_Brief

24-1073 Amicus Brief

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

                        No. 24-1073

                            In the
     Supreme Court of the United States

              GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

                                                     Petitioner,

                                v.

                  UNITED STATES,

                                                    Respondent.


     On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of A ppeals for the Second Circuit


   BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE NATIONAL
  ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE
  LAWYERS IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER


Jeffrey T. Green                     Sara Elizabeth Kropf
  Co-Chair Amicus                      Counsel of Record
    Committee                        K ropf Moseley Schmitt
National A ssociation of               PLLC
  Criminal Defense Lawyers           1100 H Street NW
1600 L Street NW                     Suite 1220
Washington, DC 20036                 Washington, DC 20005
                                     (202) 627-6900
                                     sara@kmlawfirm.com
                                       Counsel for Amicus Curiae


120443

                         A
                  (800) 274-3321 • (800) 359-6859
                                       i

                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                                                         Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i

TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii

INTEREST OF AMICI  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

I N T RODUC T ION A N D SU M M A RY OF
   ARGUMENT  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

ARGUMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

   1.    Defendants should be able to rely on the
         government’s promises and courts should
         not hesitate to enforce them . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

   2.    The Department of Justice knows how to
         

[…]

Open in the archive