EpsteinProject.org

Court records

2024.01.16_Reply_1

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

 IN THE SIJPERJOR COURT
  OF THE VIRGIN I LANDS



   FILED
Ja nu ary 16, 2024 11:47 AM
 ST-2020-CV-00155
 TAMARA CHARLES                        IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
CLERK OF THE COURT                          DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN


                                                *********************************

                 GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

                              Plaintiff,

                              v.

                 ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
                 DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as                    CIVIL NO: ST-20-CV-155
                 EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
                 JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, RICHARD D.                          COMPLEX
                 KAHN, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF
                 THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. ESTEIN,
                 and NES, LLC, a New York Limited
                 Liability Company,

                              Defendants.


                      CO-EXECUTORS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO
                      DISMISS, OR ALTERNATIVELY, COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR PRO SE

                          DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, by and through their undersigned

                counsel, in their capacity as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the “Estate”), and

                on behalf of the Estate and NES, LLC (“NES”), an entity administered in probate by the Co-

                Executors as part of the Estate (collectively, “Defendants”), respectfully submit this reply in

                support of their supplemental motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, or alternatively, to

                compel Plaintiff Ghislaine Maxwell (“Maxwell”) to appear pro se.

                                            BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

                          Almost four years ago, Maxwell initiated this action, seeking contractual and common law

                indemnification of attorneys

[…]

Open in the archive