EpsteinProject.org

Court records

2022.08.05_Notice_to_the_Court

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

 IN THE SIJPERJOR CO URI
  OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS



   FILED
August 05, 2 022 03 :58 ~M
 S T-20 2 0-CV-00155
 TAMARA CHARLES                        IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
CLERK OF THE COURT                          DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

                                                                             CIVIL CASE NO.: ST-2020-CV-00155

               GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

                                 Plaintiff,

               vs.

               ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, DARREN
               K. INDYKE, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF
               THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
               RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as
               EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E.
               EPSTEIN, and NES, LLC, a New York Limited
               Liability Company,

                           Defendants.
               ________________________________________

                       JOINT NOTICE TO COURT PURSUANT TO ORDER DATED AUGUST 2, 2022

                           Plaintiff GHISLAINE MAXWELL (“Plaintiff”), Defendants ESTATE OF JEFFREY E.

               EPSTEIN, DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as Executor of The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein,

               RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as Executor of The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and NES,

               LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company (collectively, “Defendants”), and Proposed

               Intervenor GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS (“GVI”), through

               their respective undersigned attorneys, pursuant to this Court’s Order dated August 2, 2022, advise

               as follows:

                           1.    Defendants request oral argument on the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff does not waive,

               and expressly reserves, the right to present oral argument in connection with the motion to dismiss

               should the Court choose to hear the same.
                                   

[…]

Open in the archive