EpsteinProject.org

Court records

2020.09.28_Response_to_Opposition

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
  OFTHE VIRGIN ISLANDS



  FILED
 September 28, 2020

 TAMARA CHARLES                   IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
CLERK OF THE COURT                      DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS & ST. JOHN
                                          *********************************
               GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

                          Plaintiff,

                          v.

               ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
               DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as                    CIVIL NO. ST-20-CV-155
               EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF
               JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, RICHARD D.
               KAHN, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF
               THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
               and NES, LLC, a New York Limited
               Liability Company

                          Defendants.


                         CO-EXECUTORS’ REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS

                         DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, by and through their undersigned

              counsel, in their capacity as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the “Estate”), and

              on behalf of the Estate and NES, LLC (“NES”), an entity administered in probate by the Co-

              Executors as part of the Estate, respectfully submit this Reply Brief in further support of their

              Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed in this action on May 1, 2020 (the “Motion to Dismiss”).

                 I.      MAXWELL’S CLAIM FOR COMMON LAW INDEMNIFICATION IS UNRIPE
                         AND SHOULD BE DISMISSED.

                         Maxwell initially filed her Complaint prematurely in violation of 15 V.I.C. § 606(a).

              (Motion to Dismiss at 1–2, 4–6.) After forcing the Co-Executors to file the Motion to Dismiss,

              Maxwell implicitly conceded her error and, on June 1, 2020, jointly moved with the Co-Executors

              for a stay of this action until the re

[…]

Open in the archive