EpsteinProject.org

Court records

2020.06.01_Motion

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT
 OF THE \ "IRGIN ISLANDS



  FILED
 June 01, 2020

 TAMARA CHARLES
CLERK OF THE COURT
                                        IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS
                                             DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

                                                                                    CIVIL CASE NO.: ST-20-CV-155

                   GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

                                  Plaintiff,

                   vs.

                   ESTA TE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, DARREN
                   K. INDYKE, in his capacity as EXECUTOR OF
                   THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
                   RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as
                   EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E.
                   EPSTEIN, and NES, LLC, a New York Limited
                   Liability Company,

                                  Defendants.


                                               JOINT MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

                           Plaintiff GHISLAINE MAXWELL ("Plaintiff"), and Defendants DARREN K. INDYKE

                    ("Indyke") and RICHARD D. KAHN ("Kahn"), by and though their undersigned counsel, in their

                    capacity as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"), and on behalf of the

                    Estate and NES, LLC, an entity administered in probate by the Co-Executors as part of the Estate

                    (collectively, the "Defendants"), through their respective undersigned attorneys, hereby file this

                    Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings until September 7, 2020, and state as follows:

                           1.     "The power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to

                    control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for

                    counsel, and for litigants." Burke v. Treasure Bay V.I. 

[…]

Open in the archive