EpsteinProject.org

Court records

086_1

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2009 Page 1 of 8




                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                        CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON



  JANE DOE N0. 2.

               Plaintiff,

  vs.

  JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

              Defendant.
  _________________________________/
  Related Cases:
  08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994,
  08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
  09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092

  PLAINTIFF, CAROLYN M. ANDRIANO’S, RESPONSE TO THIRD PARTY WITNESS,
   IGOR ZINOVIEW’S, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND INCORPORATED
                          MEMORANDUM OF LAW

         Plaintiff, Carolyn M. Andriano, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby

  files her Response Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoview’s, Motion For Protective Order

  and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 402), and in support thereof states as

  follows:

         1.    Third party witness, Igor Zinoview, seeks to have this Court enter an order

  preventing his deposition from going forward at all, or, in the alternative, limiting the

  scope of permissible questioning during same. Mr. Zinoview’s deposition is presently

  scheduled to be taken on December 18, 2009.

         2.    Mr. Zinoview has been employed by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, as his

  “driver, bodyguard, and trainer” since November of 2005. See Affidavit of Igor Zinoview
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/28/2009 Page 2 of 8




  (D.E. 402) dated November 9, 2009. Mr. Zinoview argues that his deposition should not

  go forward as scheduled because Defendant Epstein has never discussed nor

  attempted to discuss with him “any facts or information related to any legal matters in

  which he [Jeffrey Epstein] is involved.” Id. From Mr. Zinoview’s vague assertion springs

  the bold yet erroneous argument that “Mr. Zinoview cannot possibly have any


[…]

Open in the archive