EpsteinProject.org

Court records

080

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 1 of 26




                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                               SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                           CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON

       JANE DOE NO. 2,

              Plaintiff,
       vs.

       JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

         Defendant.
       ______________ _;/
       Related cases:
       08-80232, 08-083 80, 08-803 81, 08-80994,
       08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,

       ______________
       09-80591,09-80656,09-80802,09-81092
                                                    _;/

                           THIRD PARTY WITNESS, IGOR ZINOVIEW'S,
                             MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
                            INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LA,v

              Third Paiiy Witness, Igor Zinoview's, ("Mr. Zinoview") by and through his

       undersigned attorney, moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) for a protective

       order regarding his deposition and as grounds therefore would state:

              1.      As reflected on the affidavit of Igor Zinoview, attached as Exhibit A, he

       works for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Mr. Epstein") as a driver and bodyguard. He did

       not know Mr. Epstein before November of 2005. He first became employed by Mr.

       Epstein in November of 2005.

              2.      Additionally, Mr. Zinoview would testify as set forth on his affidavit, that

       at no time has he discussed with Mr. Epstein any issues involving Mr. Epstein's criminal

       case nor any of the cases or issues involved with civil plaintiffs.
Case 9:09-cv-80591-KAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/09/2009 Page 2 of 26




              3.         In many of the depositions, counsel for L.M. and E.W., has asked them as

       witnesses to assume ce1iain facts about which they have no knowledge, and he then asks

       their opinions about certain 

[…]

Open in the archive