EpsteinProject.org

Court records

063_6

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

       Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB                  Document 63       Filed 07/22/25   Page 1 of 4



                                                                    EJLECTR:ClPHCALLY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
------------------------------------------------------------X
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
                Government,
                                                                        19 CR. 490 (RMB)
        -against-
                                                                            ORDER
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
                          Defendant.
-------------------------------------------------------------X

        The Court has received a four page "United States' Motion to Unseal Grand Jury

Transcripts" filed with the S.D.N.Y. Clerk's Office on Friday evening, July 18, 2025. See ECF

No. 61 (Gov't Motion). The Gov't Motion requests that the Court "unseal the underlying grand

jury transcripts in United States v. Epstein, subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and

other personal identifying information." Id. at 1-2.

        The Court intends to resolve this motion expeditiously. However, the Court cannot rule

on the motion without additional submissions from the Government. Specifically:

        Memorandum of law: Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) codified the practice,

"'older than our Nation itself,' that proceedings before a grand jury shall generally remain

secret." In re Petition of Craig, 131 F.3d 99, 102 (2d Cir. 1997) (quoting In re Biaggi, 478 F.2d

489, 491 (2d Cir. 1973) (Friendly, C.J.)); see also Douglas Oil Co. of'Cal. v. Petrol Stops Nw.,

441 U.S. 211,218 (1979). Rule 6(e)(3) lists exceptions to the rule of secrecy but these are not

invoked by the Government's Motion. The Second Circuit - but not many other circuits - has

recognized that there are ce1tain "special circumstances" in which release of grand jury records

may be appropriate, based upon a court's supervisory au

[…]

Open in the archive