EpsteinProject.org

Court records

052_14

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

    Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB        Document 52         Filed 08/29/19    Page 1 of 2

     Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 47-1 Filed 08/19/19 Page 1 of 2



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
 - - - - -    - - - - - -- - -          X
                                                  NOLLE PROSEQUI
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                                  19 Cr. 4
                  -v. -                                         USDCSDNY
                                                                DOCUMENT
 JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
                                                                ELECTRONICALLY FILED
                     Defendant.                                 DOC#:
                                                                DATE FILED: ~1111/j
 - - - -   - - - - - - - - -            X



             1.    The filing of this nolle prosequi will dispose of

this case with respect to JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant.

             2.    On     July   2,   2019,    Indictment       19     Cr.    490     (the

"Indictment")       was    returned,        charging     JEFFREY       EPSTEIN,        the

defendant, with one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking

of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C.             §    371, and one count of sex

· trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591.

             3.    On •or about       August    10,     2019,   while        the    above-

captioned case was         pending,     but prior        to any      trial     or other

disposition, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died.

             4.    Because JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died while

this case was pending, and therefore before a final judgment was

issued,    the    Indictment     must   be     dismissed      under     the    rule     of

abatement. See United States v. Wright, 160 F.3d 905, 908 (2d Cir.

1998).
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB           Document 52         Filed 08/29/19        Page 2 of 

[…]

Open in the archive