EpsteinProject.org

Court records

051_6

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/15/2009 Page 1 of 3




                              UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                              SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                           CASE NO.: 09-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON

  JANE DOE No. 102,

                     Plaintiff,
  V.

  JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

                      Defendant,
  ______________/

       DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION
         OF TIME IN WHICH SERVE RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO COMPLAINT

       Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter "Epstein"), by and through his undersigned

  attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to

  Complaint dated, May 1, 2009 [DE 1]. Defendant seeks an extension until October 30,

  2009, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant

  states:

       1. On May 1, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1]. Defendant's response would

   be due on August 20, 2009, as previously agreed upon.

       2. The parties continue to work together to potentially resolve this case.

       3. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will

   provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN to fully and adequately respond.

       4. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and

   Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/15/2009 Page 2 of 3




  Doe 102 v. Epstein
  Page 2

     WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order

  granting an extension until October 30, 2009, to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint.

                                   Local Rule 7.1 Statement

         Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone and correspondence with

  counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested

  extension

[…]

Open in the archive