EpsteinProject.org

Court records

051_2

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

   Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF        Document 51    Filed 08/14/20     Page 1 of 1
                                                            305 BROADWAY, SUITE 607
CUTI HECKER WANG LLP                                        NEW YORK, NY 10007

                                                            MARIANN MEIER WANG
                                                            212.620.2603 TEL
                                                            212.620.2613 FAX

                                                            MWANG@CHWLLP.COM




                                                   August 14, 2020
By ECF

Hon. Debra Freeman
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007-1312

              Re:   Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF)
                    Mary Doe v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF)
                    Davies v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)

Your Honor:

              We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As
directed in Your Honor’s Order dated June 22, 2020, we write jointly with counsel
for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate
of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the “Co-Executors”), to provide a status update.

              These cases were stayed on June 22, 2020 pending the plaintiffs in
each of these cases attempting to resolve their claims against the Co-Executors
through the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The plaintiffs are currently
in the process of presenting their claims to the administrators of that Program, and
the parties remain hopeful that all claims in these matters will be resolved through
the Program. Accordingly, all parties believe that these cases should remain stayed
at this time. We will notify the Court once the Program has progressed further such
that either the claims are resolved or the stays should be lifted.

          

[…]

Open in the archive