EpsteinProject.org

Court records

047-01_1

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

          Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB                            Document 47-1              Filed 08/19/19     Page 1 of 2



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
  -   -    -   -   -        -   -     -     -   -   -   -   -             X
                                                                                   NOLLE PROSEQUI
 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
                                                                                   19 Cr . 4 9 0 (RMB)
                                    -v. -

 JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

                                          Defendant.

 -    -    -   -   -    -       -    -     -    -   -   -   -    -   -   X



                       1.            The filing of this nolle prosequi will dispose of

this case with respect to JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant.

                       2.            On         July        2,       2019,      Indictment        19     Cr.    490     (the

"Indictment")                         was           returned,                charging      JEFFREY        EPSTEIN,      the

defendant, with one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking

of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and one count of sex

trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591.

                       3.            On or about                     August      10,     2019,    while        the   above-

captioned              case               was       pending,             but   prior      to   any      trial    or other

disposition, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died.

                       4.            Because JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, died while

this case was pending, and therefore before a final judgment was

issued,            the          Indictment                  must         be    dismissed       under      the    rule    of

abatement. See United States v. Wright, 160 F.3d 905, 908 (2d Cir.

1998) .
    Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB      Document 47-1    Filed 08/19/19   Page 2 of 2

[…]

Open in the archive