EpsteinProject.org

Court records

045_20

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

      Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF     Document 45    Filed 12/18/19   Page 1 of 17




                            UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

                              CASE NO.: 1:19-cv-07625-AJN

VE,

              Plaintiff,

vs.

DARREN K. INDYKE AND
RICHARD D. KAHN AS JOINT
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF
THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
NINE EAST 71ST STREET, CORPORATION,
FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC.,
NES, LLC,
            Defendant.
___________________________________/




             PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO
                     DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
       Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF                                   Document 45                 Filed 12/18/19               Page 2 of 17




                                                          TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF AUTHORITIES……………………………………………………………………..ii

I.         PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............................................................................................ 1
II.        ARGUMENT .......................................................................................................................... 2
      A.           Legal Standard.................................................................................................................. 2
      B.           Count I of Plaintiff’s Complaint is not time barred nor is it duplicative of Count II. ...... 3
      C.           Plaintiff has adequately pled her negligence claims against the Corporate Defendants. . 5
           i.      Plaintiff’s “negligent security” claim against Nine East (Count III) should not be
                   dismissed. ......................................................................................................................... 6
           ii.        Plaintiff’s negligence claim against FTC (Count IV) should not be dismissed. .......... 8
           iii.       Plaintiff’s negligence claim agai

[…]

Open in the archive