EpsteinProject.org

Court records

040_12

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 1 of 3



                           UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                           SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

                      CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469- MARRA/JOHNSON




 JANE DOE II,

                     Plaintiff,
 V.

 JEFFREY EPSTEIN,

                     Defendant.
 - - - - - - - - - - - - -I
        NOTICE OF RELIANCE ON AND INCORPORATION OF DEFENDANT'S
      REPLY {DE 31} TO PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION
               TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS{DE 20 & 36)

         Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his

 undersigned attorneys, hereby gives notice of his intent to rely on and incorporate hereon

 Defendant's Reply to Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to

  Dismiss:

         I.     Defendant, EPSTEIN, filed his Motion to Dismiss on May 9, 2009 (DE 13).

         2.     Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, filed her initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition to

  Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2009 (DE 20).

         3.     Defendant, EPSTEIN, filed his Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II's, Memorandum of

  Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss on June 1, 2009 (DE 31 ).

         4.     After a hearing on June 12, 2009, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, stated he

  would withdraw certain claims in Plaintiff, Jane Doe II' s initial Memorandum of Law in

  Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss (DE 20).
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 2 of 3




 Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
 Page 2

         5.       Therefore, Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, filed her Amended Memorandum of Law in

 Opposition to Defendant Epstein's Motion to Dismiss on June 12, 2009 (DE 36).

         6.       Based upon the forgoing, Defendant relies on his Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II's,

 Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epste

[…]

Open in the archive