Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:19-cv-10577-LJL-DCF Document 39 Filed 03/30/20 Page 1 of 32
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
JANE DOE 1000,
Plaintiff, CASE NO: 19-cv-10577-LJL
v.
DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN,
in their capacities as the executors of the
ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case 1:19-cv-10577-LJL-DCF Document 39 Filed 03/30/20 Page 2 of 32
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ............................................................................................................. 2
ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 4
I. Defendants Have Not Met Their Burden of Proving that Plaintiff’s Claims Are Untimely..... 5
A. Plaintiff’s Claims Are Timely Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8)(a). ...................................... 5
1. The Indictment Was Not Restricted to Minors. ............................................................ 6
2. Plaintiff’s Claims Concern the Same Sex-Trafficking Operation that the Indictment
Concerned. .................................................................................................................... 7
3. Defendants’ Attempts to Narrow the Scope of C.P.L.R. § 215(8)(a) Fail. ................... 9
B. Plaintiff’s Claims are Timely Pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 213-c .................................... 11
C. De
[…]