EpsteinProject.org

Court records

036_14

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

       Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS              Document 36                                           Filed 03/20/17   Page 1 of 7




                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                            SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

--------------------------------------------------X




                                              ..
                                              .............................................
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS,

        Plaintiff,
v.
                                                                                                      17-mc-00025-RWS
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

        Defendant.


--------------------------------------------------X


                     Defendant’s Sur-Reply to Supplemental Reply




                                                                                              Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
                                                                                              HADDON, MORGAN AND FOREMAN, P.C.
                                                                                              150 East 10th Avenue
                                                                                              Denver, CO 80203
                                                                                              303.831.7364
       Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS             Document 36         Filed 03/20/17      Page 2 of 7




                                         INTRODUCTION

       Almost one year after being served with a subpoena to produce documents in this matter

Mr. Edwards, for the first time, claims, with no real legal support, that the letters he sent to

various former employees of Jeffrey Epstein and other potential witnesses are “work product”.

Mr. Edwards attempts to obfuscate the issue by claiming that he would have to review hundreds,

no, thousands, of emails to determine to whom such solicitations were sent. Mr. Edwards knows

that he sent a form soli

[…]

Open in the archive