EpsteinProject.org

Court records

035_2

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

                                                               305 BROADWAY, SUITE 607
CUTI HECKER WANG LLP                                           NEW YORK, NY 10007

                                                               DANIEL MULLKOFF
                                                               212.620.2606 TEL
                                                               212.620.2616 FAX

                                                               DMULLKOFF@CHWLLP.COM




                                               April 8, 2020

By ECF
Hon. Debra Freeman
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Daniel Patrick Moynihan
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007-1312

              Re:   Davies v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)

Your Honor:

             We represent Plaintiff Teala Davies. We write regarding Defendants’
pending motion to dismiss (ECF 26) to ask the Court to disregard a new legal
argument that Defendants have improperly raised for the first time in their reply
brief (ECF 34).

              In their motion, Defendants contend, inter alia, that Plaintiff’s claims
arising from sexual assaults inflicted on her by Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico when
she was seventeen years old are time-barred under New Mexico law. Defs.’ MOL in
Support of Motion (ECF 27) at 4. In their moving brief, Defendants correctly
identified the applicable New Mexico law governing statutes of limitations in
childhood sexual abuse cases such as this one:

      Plaintiff’s claims based on alleged torts occurring outside New York
      also expired long ago under the laws of those jurisdictions, including
      non-New York torts that occurred while she was a minor (if any), as
      follows: . . . (New Mexico) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the
      later of the “first instant” of Plaintiff’s 24th birthday (i.e., sometime in
      2009) or 3 years from the date that Plaintiff first disclosed her
      childho

[…]

Open in the archive