EpsteinProject.org

Court records

029_25

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

    Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR   Document 29   Filed 07/06/23   Page 1 of 27




                IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
              FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK



                                     Master Case No. 1:23-cv-03903-JSR
IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
                                     DERIVATIVE ACTION




          DEFENDANT JAMES E. STALEY’S MEMORANDUM OF
         LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
          Case 1:23-cv-03903-JSR                         Document 29                 Filed 07/06/23                Page 2 of 27




                                                    TABLE OF CONTENTS

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .....................................................................................................1

BACKGROUND .............................................................................................................................2

          A.         Parties ......................................................................................................................2

          B.         The Alleged Wrongdoing ........................................................................................3

          C.         Procedural History ...................................................................................................4

ARGUMENT ...................................................................................................................................6

          I.         Plaintiffs Have Failed To Show That Demand on the Board Is Excused ................6

                     A.         Plaintiffs Cannot Show Demand Futility as to Mr. Staley Because
                                the Bank Has Already Sued Him on the Same Allegations .........................8

                     B.         Plaintiffs’ Allegations That the Board Could Not Impartially
                                Consider a Litigation Demand Fall Short .........

[…]

Open in the archive