Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF Document 29 Filed 03/20/20 Page 1 of 31
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
TERESA HELM,
Plaintiff, CASE NO: 19-cv-10476-PGG
v.
DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN,
in their capacities as the executors of the
ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
Defendants.
_____________________________________
PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF Document 29 Filed 03/20/20 Page 2 of 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS ............................................................................................................. 3
ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 6
I. Defendants Have Not Met Their Burden of Proving that Plaintiff’s Claims Are Untimely..... 6
A. Plaintiff’s Claims Are Timely Under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8)(a). ...................................... 7
1. The Indictment Was Not Restricted to Minors. ............................................................ 8
2. Plaintiff’s Claims Concern the Same Sex-Trafficking Operation that the Indictment
Concerned. .................................................................................................................... 9
3. Defendants’ Attempts to Narrow the Scope of C.P.L.R. § 215(8)(a) Fail. ................. 11
B. Defendants Have Not Met Their Burden of Proving that Plaintiff Cannot Invoke
Equitable Estoppel. .....................................................................................
[…]