EpsteinProject.org

Court records

029_19

Format
pdf
Set
Court Records
Text
Searchable

View at the original source

Text as released

Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.

      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS         Document 29      Filed 12/22/16   Page 1 of 6




                         UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
                         SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
                           FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION

                        CASE NO. 16-61262-MC-GOODMAN
                   UNDERLYING CASE NO. 15-CV-07433-RWS (S.D.N.Y)

BRADLEY J. EDWARDS,

      Plaintiff,
v.

GHISLAINE MAXWELL,

      Defendant.
                         __/

           ORDER TRANSFERRING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA
            OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER

      Bradley J. Edwards (“Edwards”) filed in the Southern District of Florida a motion

to quash a subpoena issued to him by Ghislaine Maxwell (“Maxwell”). [ECF No. 1]. 1

The subpoena was issued in the Southern District of New York in the underlying case,

Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 1:15-cv-07433-RWS. Maxwell opposed the motion to quash. [ECF

No. 8] and Edwards replied to Maxwell’s opposition. [ECF No. 13]. United States

District Judge Jose E. Martinez referred Edwards’ motion to me. [ECF No. 11]. Maxwell

filed a status update in this Court regarding the contested Edwards Subpoena and the

related rulings in the underlying action (“notice”). [ECF No. 24].

1
     The subject subpoena of Edwards’ motion to quash is referred to as the
“Edwards Subpoena.”[ECF No. 1-3].
                                            1
      Case 1:17-mc-00025-RWS           Document 29   Filed 12/22/16   Page 2 of 6




       Having read the parties’ submissions and reviewed the docket in the underlying

case in New York and a related motion filed in the District Court of Utah, the Court

finds, sua sponte, that exceptional circumstances exist under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 45(f) that warrant transfer of Edwards’ motion to the court with jurisdiction

over the underlying case. 2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(f).

       Rule 45(f) allows the court where compliance with a subpoena is required to

transfer a sub

[…]

Open in the archive