Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE-DCF Document 27 Filed 11/20/19 Page 1 of 2
Troutman Sanders LLP
875 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022
troutmariP
troutman.com
sanders
Bennet J. Moskowitz
bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
November 20, 2019
ECF
Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer
Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: Jane Doe 17 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal
Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al., 1:19-cv-09610 (PAE)
Dear Judge Engelmayer:
We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of
Jeffrey E. Epstein (named herein as “Joint Personal Representative[s] of the Estate of Jeffrey E.
Epstein”), Nine East 71st Street, Corporation, Financial Trust Company, Inc., NES, LLC, Laurel,
Inc., Maple, Inc., LSJE, LLC, HBRK Associates, Inc., Nautilus, Inc., Cypress, Inc., and JEGE,
Inc. (together, “Defendants”) in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request that the
Court vacate its Order dated November 8, 2019 (ECF #25) granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed
Anonymously (the “Motion”) (ECF #24) filed earlier that day. The basis for this request is that
Your Honor’s Order dated November 5, 2019 (ECF #21) provides Defendants through
December 21, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion.
Defendants did not have an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion. Defendants do not
object to Plaintiff proceeding anonymously to prevent the disclosure of her identity to the
general public. However, Defendants seek the opportunity to be heard so the relief granted on
Plaintiff’s Motion ensures Plaintiff may protect her anonymity without jeopardizing Defendants’
fundamental right to fully and fairly defend against this action.
Plaintiffs’ counsel does not consent to this
[…]