Court records
- Format
- Set
- Court Records
- Text
- Searchable
Text as released
Machine-read from the scan. Names, dates and numbers can be misread — check anything you rely on against the original page.
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 1 of 9
LAW OFFICE OF
MARC FERNICH
MARC FERNICH maf@fernichlaw.com 810 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 620
ALSO ADMITTED IN MASSACHUSETTS NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019
212-446-2346
FAX: 212-459-2299
www.fernichlaw.com
July 16, 2019
BY ECF
Hon. Richard M. Berman
USDJ-SDNY
500 Pearl St.
New York, NY 10007
Re: US v. Epstein, 19 CR 490 (SDNY)
Dear Judge Berman:
In response to requests from the Court and certain arguments made
yesterday by the government, we write to supplement Jeffrey Epstein’s
request for bail.
First, make no mistake about the crux of the government’s
detention argument and its necessary implications. Stripped to its core,
the government’s position – as urged in its letters and echoed again
yesterday – distills to this: the nominally rebuttable remand
presumption (connected with 18 USC § 1591 charges) 1 plus Epstein’s
1 To be clear, Epstein contends that § 1591 and the concomitant remand presumption
do not contemplate or cover the core conduct at issue here: performing sexual
Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 24 Filed 07/16/19 Page 2 of 9
Hon. Richard M. Berman
July 16, 2019
Page 2
wealth creates an irrebuttable presumption whereby no condition(s) can
reasonably assure personal appearance or protect the public. The Court
should reject the government’s misguided effort to effectively create a per
se rule.2 Indeed, for the government, there’s literally nothing a person of
Epstein’s means could say, do or pledge to rebut
[…]